Archive for November, 2007
Too much drink = not enough sleep?
Posted by: | CommentsI’ve just come back from the doctors this evening because I’ve been having difficulty sleeping. For those of you that have not failed to notice my poor spelling in recent posts, that is the reason why.

The doctor suggests one possible cause is that my drinking habits are impacting my sleep and or quality of sleep. I don’t really think I drink that much and even Julie was surprised when I told her.  I probably drink around three bottles of wine a week at most, sometimes nothing at all. The doctor (a fantastic doctor I might add) had suggested I just cut down, but given how awful I feel I’m going to cut out drink completely and caffeine as well. Fortunately I actually like herbal beverages and fruit juice so it won’t be a great problem for me.Â
I’m going back in two weeks so I’ll be sure to follow up and keep my progress posted.Â
BBC Reports “‘Muhammad’ teddy teacher arrested”
Posted by: | CommentsYes that’s right, a British school teacher working in Sudan has been arrested according to the BBC for allowing children in her class to call a teddy Muhammad.

Rarely do I resort to coarse language in my writing of issues around religion but my immediate reaction was WTF! The BBC reported this charge of insulting the prophet could result in six months imprisionment, 40 lashes, or a fine. In my view the fine would be the most proportionate, but having said that what exactly did she do wrong? She didn’t call the teddy “prophet Muhammed”, just plain old Muhammed, which as I understand is a common name in many countries.
It’s similar to the blasphemy law in this country, Muslims and other faiths want this extended to cover them as well as the Christian church. I find this whole arguement that people can be prosecuted because they say Jesus Christ! or draw a cartoon of some prophet unacceptable. Is religion so weak that it can never be challenged? Prof. Dawkins and me don’t always see eye to eye, but on this we can agree, the attitude that religion trumps all is bollocks. After all there is no credible evidence that God even exists!Â
Tolerance is one thing, but punishing this woman on behalf of someone that (at best) is long dead is just lunacy. If this prophet ever existed, there is no proof that God exists. If he God exists and this is how he treats his “Children” then he’s a sick puppy and not worthy of anyone’s worship.  After all if God does exist why does he need us to do his dirty work? He could strike us atheists and sinners down with some lightning or something.  This is all too rational for some to comprehend, and I’m sure the religious extremists have numerous “get out” clauses for inflicting pain and suffering on the innocent.
I’m not one of those “Militant atheists” we hear so much about in the press, but even I get angry when I hear of such spite and evil being carried out in the name of religion. I call on all the moderate Muslims and other religions to condemn this action publicly.  I know that not all religious people are this way, because I’m friends with many religious people including Muslims and they would never condone this.
Perhaps next time God offends me I should take him to the courthouse for some redress. Perhaps those in Bangledesh could sue him for damages after losing their homes recently? Perhaps the people of England whose homes were flooded in the July storms, could sue the church for this “Act of God”, and claim compensation from the Church of England as his divine representatives on Earth? No? why not? think about it..
A Week of Religion – Part 3
Posted by: | CommentsThe final and third part of my week of religion culminates with this mornings edition of “The Big Questions“. I was very pleased to see Richard Dawkins participating in the debate this moring, and I think the conducted himself very well.  I must admit a trepidation when Dawkins gets the floor as he can sometimes express views which are a little off the wall. However he did discuss the idea of religious indoctrination being child abuse, and he made good sense in suggesting comparative RE was the way forward.
One thing I picked up throughout the debate though, was this reference by Christians that the secular had some agenda to indoctrinate society with their view (I suppose like the old Stalin reference). As a humanist I would never deny anyone their freedom of religion, and I would die to defend their freedom of religion. My son has expressed a view that he doesn’t believe the story of Christianity, and that is as far as he has gone. He may well choose something else like Buddhism, or Zoroastrianism, or Baha’i. Then again he may choose humanism. I can’t say and it isn’t for me to say what my son should or should not choose to believe. Rachael has equally expressed an interest in the Brownies, and we have gone to great lengths to explain the obligation to God that she needs to make when she joins.Â
However parents of religion don’t allow their children that same free choice. They don’t sit down and say, I’m a Christian and its up to you to decide for yourself. I wonder how many Christian parents would have responded the way I did when Michael asked not to go to religious assembly?
In my mind the idea of indoctrinating someone to humanist views is as wrong as indoctrination of a specific religious view and goes against the very principle of free thinking. When I discuss my belief with my children, they know that I own that belief, and they are free to choose if they accept or reject my ideas. Equally Julie’s Paganism is there to accept or reject as they choose, as is any ideology.
Now where I disagree with Dawkins is that baptism is child abuse and he argues that labeling children is harmful. I was baptised and I feel that to acknowledge it, just gives it credability. It means absolutely nothing to me, and I treat the event as if it never happend.  People label us all the time, and I am labelled as Christmas hater by some. This label only affects me if I allow it to influence my thinking and the choices I make. My grandmother still insists I am a good Christian boy, even though I’ve told her I don’t accept the teachings of the Christian church. It doesn’t matter, and it doesn’t change our relationship.
I’m interested to know if anyone thinks secularists have any special influence. I’m not aware that Dawkins or Rushdie are partnering to build shelters or medical centres, but then humanists would do this through the construct of a secular government.
A Week of Religion – Part 2
Posted by: | CommentsSo following on from my first part in a week of religion we turn to local news. Community plans for church site.
This report from the BBC in Berkshire highlights how the government’s policy to start what is effectively an outsourcing to the church. While I think the idea of setting up sheltered housing, and a new community medical centre are laudable, I am concerned by the way government at national and local level are continually getting into bed with the church. It started with schools and now it is moving to our community services like healthcare.
The BBC report doesn’t give a lot of detail but simply states “Berkshire West PCT and the borough council are supporting the plans.” which is worrying. Does the chruch involvement mean limitation on who can be serviced? Will they shelter all, or just those that they proselytise to during their stay. Does treatment come with a sermon if a woman is seeking the morning after pill? or advice on abortion?
I fear this is a grave and dangerous path that is being walked upon, and I would ask the government what safeguards are in place to ensure fair treatment to all the users of this facility. We see religious preference pervading our society as a result of historical influences, and it seems just another place where religious money provides religious influence.
A Week of Religion – Part 1
Posted by: | CommentsI’ve been fairly silent this week over my religious outcries, but there have certainly been a few to comment on. There is the most atrocious one which resulted in a woman in Saudi being sentenced to flogging because she dared allow herself to be put in the position to be gang raped. Then I came across the church in Reading that is joining forces with the local primary care trust to build a new health facility servicing mind, body and spirit. Finally we I saw and interesting thread of conversation in the BBC show “The Big Questions”, which suggests secularists are brainwashing people. To make it easy for you I’ll break these into three items, so you can digest them a piece at a time.
So to my first point, and as always I’ve included my source link for completeness. The story titled “Saudis back rape victim sentence“. Yes that is correct a woman was sentenced by Saudi courts to 200 lashes and six months imprisonment for having been raped 14 times. Seven men were found guilty of the crime and the BBC reports the worst offender only got 5 years. I suppose the Saudi courts would argue that she deserved it because she was travelling in a car with a man who was not related to her. Comments from BBC readers in Saudi suggest this is as a result of sectarian views, not ones of justice, and some also seem to condemn the action to punish her. There is also the view that this was done because she dared to appeal her original sentence of 60 lashes, and embarrased the court in the media.
I almost feel I don’t need to express a position on this topic, because what moral human being would not be outraged that this woman has to suffer such an atrocity. Raped, and then punished with flogging and imprisonment! It is at moments like these I applaud and support the works of Amnesty International. One would expect the UN to wade in and condemn this, but they don’t. At least Hillary Clinton has had the courage of her convictions and made her voice heard. The US, and the UK have been deafeningly silent over this issue, I wonder what defence contract could be jeopordised by speaking up? Perhaps this woman should suffer in the name of “War on Terror”? As far as I can see this is nothing but a war of terror in the name of religion against a poor young woman.
Greed is good?
Posted by: | CommentsThis weekend I went shopping in Basingstoke, which in itself is not an unfamiliar event to anyone. Why would I write about something so mundane you ask? Let me start to explain in saying that I had a bizarre reaction to the swell of people converging on the shopping centre and noticed some altogether disgusting human behaviour. Behaviour I would liken to that of animals in a zoo, where it not for the fact that would denigrate the animals in the zoo.

It all started out reasonably well, and I was a little concerned that the car parks were filling up quickly as we arrived. No problem though because we managed to find a space in the upper levels of festival place quite easily.
So we took the lift down and started going around the shops, but there were masses of people absolutely everywhere! All these people were going about their business, and shopping as you’d expect. What disturbed me the most is that not a single one of them seemed to have any consideration for anyone else around them. Â
Firstly we went to get some coffee from one of those quaint little shops that sells fresh ground coffee. It was quite packed so I decided to take the kids outside. In the doorway were two young women who blocked the route out, and so in a clear tone I politely said ”please excuse me”. I was ignored, although I am quite sure the young woman heard me. So I raised my voice ever so gently and said in a more irritated tone, “excuse me please!”, at which point she gave me a dirty look and let us pass.
As we continued around the mall I noticed that all the shops were all equally packed, and there was a large contingent of police patrolling it the mall. I estimated there were between 6-10 police officers patrolling as we went around. Perhaps to save us all from terrorists, or militant shoppers?
The next event occurred as I walked out of a book store following behind the kids, and a man with a large back pack barged his way in front of me, and then continued to walk slowly in front of me so that I could not catch up with my wife and children.  At this point I was starting to feel quite irritated and cross, with all these idiot people blocking doorways, stopping dead in front of me, and generally being a bloody nuisance. Even as I recount the episode I feel a great swell of anger rising in me, perhaps some kind of conditioned response to people getting in my personal space.
The next event happened as Michael and I waited for Julie and Rachael. We were sitting on the seat in the mall and as we sat there patiently and talking a woman walked past and smacked me the back of my head with her bag. I assumed she would stop, apologise, and check I was ok, but instead she turned and gave me a look of distain, as if to say ”How dare I touch her back with the back of my head”. Â
The final straw came, when I stood outside waiting for Julie and a man quite deliberately walks to where I was standing with my two kids and lights up a cigarette. It took all of my self control, to contain the onslaught of profanity that had accumulated during this trip.Â
As Julie exited the store, she could obviously see how hard I was finding it, and I think my frequent use of the F word during trip was her first clue. She said it was time to go home and didn’t argue. As we got back to car I told her how sick I felt, an actual physical sickness had overcome me from going to the shops.
Driving back up the M3 to home I could feel the rage and anger leaving my body, and as a compromise I offered to drive Julie to the station for any future shopping trips. I would not be coming.
So to the greedy, selfish people of Basingstoke, I say consider your behaviour in public and the impact it has on others around you, because I was stones throw from smacking someone up side the head.  As a pacifist I can count the few times I have felt true rage in my life, and I would like congratulate the people of Basingstoke for adding another to my list of memorable times.
Clearly this is an issue for me that I need to contemplate further.
Playstation 3
Posted by: | CommentsWell, I’ve got one now, and joined the HD revolution. About a week ago I bought a Playstation 3, a birthday present for myself. I’ve got a number of games for it already and I’ve had a pretty positive experience.
I’ve got a number of games including “Ratchet & Clank: Tools of Destruction”, which I am currently quite addicted to. The PS3 isn’t really comparable to the Xbox 360. I can’t say I look at the two consoles and say to myself these consoles are the same. The PS3 feels much more grown up and sophisticated and than the Xbox 360, which seems to sit in what I would call the Peter Pan generation. The PS3 has a lot of other features not included with the Xbox 360, including built in wireless, web brower, and you can use any Bluetooth headset you like.
I’ve found the SIXAXIS controller to be excellent fun and it certainly adds another dimension to the games, although it doesn’t vibrate like the 360 controller. For example when playing “Ratchet & Clank” you have to do a dance to gain entrance to the pirate areas. So you press left, right, up and down to move in certain directions, and then to “Shake your booty” you literally shake the controller! Fabulous fun
The other thing that amazed me is the definition you get from looking at HD movies on the Blu Ray drive. Of course you can play normal DVD’s on the drive, and they look OK. However Blu Ray gives you a clarity that just blows you away.
The other good thing that I think Sony have got right, is that you can upgrade your internal hard drive on the PS3 to whatever size you like. If you want 250GB storage, get yourself a SATA drive and the instructions to install it are in the manual.
I’m always one of those sceptical types when it comes to media hype, but so far the console hasn’t crashed, it doesn’t sound like a Hoover, and it has a beautiful interface.
It certainly gets my thumbs up, but I’ll leave you to decide for yourself. The only drawback right now is that it doesn’t have the range of games available that the Xbox 360 does.
Rating: 4/5




National Remembrance Holiday
Posted by: | CommentsI was forwarded an interesting email today at work, which asked me if I’d like another national holiday between August and Christmas. A free day off work isn’t bad in my book, but the idea behind it makes me feel a little more purposeful about signing the e-petition that goes with it.

I alway think of those who’ve sacrificed for us on November 11th, in particular because it is the day before my brithday. I wonder if our brave soldiers hadn’t made those sacrifices would I be writing this blog today? What would life be like without those hard fought liberties?
The e-petition proposes the monday after the rememberance service as a national holiday to mark not only the brave soldiers, but what makes Britain great. A national day, similar to those of America, France, and Canada that recognises our nation and what we stand for. I suppose a sort of British thanksgiving in some ways, but a worthwhile day indeed.
I’m lending my support for the petition, and if you’d like to join me I have included a link to the right.
Happy Birthday to Me!
Posted by: | CommentsWell another birthday has arrived and I’ve had a really great weekend of celebrations. It is important for me to celebrate my birthday as I like to mark all the new discoveries, all the interesting events, and all the new people I have met.
This year I discovered that I am humanist and I made many new friends through work. Yesterday evening I had a few of my friends around to help me celebrate, and hopefully they found the evening as pleasant and enjoyable as I did. Friday night I also went bowling with Julie and our friends Richard and Melanie. This was a good fun way to celebrate, despite the fact my bowling was defintely not on form, but I consoled myself by stuffing my face with pizza.
Celebrating my birthday with friends and family is especially important to me, and I choose the people that I call friend very carefully. I don’t go in for horoscopes or any mumbo jumbo, its just about me my life and reflecting on the year that has passed.
I’m not afraid of getting older as some people are, because it seems that with each year that passes something in my life gets better. There are both good times and bad times, but I always try to be optimistic and look forward to whatever life throws my way. Call me sentimental, but I think its important to take time to reflect on what you’ve achieved, what you’ve got and how lucky we are in life. We should never take anything for granted, and make the most of every day.
I would take this opportunity to thank everyone that has sent cards, given me gifts and come along to celebrate with me. You’re all wonderful lovely people!
What do humanists talk about?
Posted by: | CommentsI just came back from my first ever humanist meeting, and I have to say that I feel quite good about it. I didn’t know quite what to expect, but having joined the Berkshire Humanist group I thought it was about time I met a few of the other members.Â

I must admit I was expecting something akin to the parish council meetings from “The Vicar of Dibley”, but it wasn’t that way at all. The people were interesting, and of all sorts of ages and backgrounds.
We met in a local bar which was next door to the venue where the meeting was taking place. I came to the meeting on my own, so I did feel slightly nervous about how I was going to find the others. Up until today I had only met David the group secretary.   Then as I stood at the bar I noticed a grey haired gentleman wander through with a humanist sticker on his jumper. So my mission to find my colleagues would prove quite easy, as they were wearing badges.
I met the youngsters of the group first which was quite good, and I suppose to them I might have appeared quite middle aged. However they seemed to open up very easily and that put me at ease.
After drinks we went through to the main meeting, and although I missed the first couple of agenda items I soon caught up. Topics covered various things like member subscriptions, and plans for the upcoming education conference in 2008. We also heard reports back from a recent BHA meeting that a couple of the members attended.
Things really got going when the floor was opened up to discussion about the BHA local project and religious discrimination. I found myself quite able to contribute and everyone seemed open and willing to listen to each other.Â
After the meeting we had coffee and I chatted with a few of the members, and volunteered myself to help work on developing their web site to attract more members and visitors.
I certainly felt a sense of belonging, and was made to feel most welcome. So all-in-all a good experience, and for the unitiated you now know what humanists talk about.